Observations
  • Home
  • Observations
  • Trendcasting
  • Odds 'n Ends
  • Science/Technology/Experiments
  • Mental Health

Internet Information...Good, Bad, and Sometimes Wrong.

2/9/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
We all know that the internet has billions of pages of information with much of the content free of cost. But, the quality of that information has to be questioned as there are a number of significant errors and actual fraudulent data being distributed.
As a blog writer, I take the responsibility of testing veracity seriously; but there are others who simply pass along content gleaned elsewhere. And, to be perfectly honest, we all have bias and prejudice in our vocabulary and have to be aware of writing content that is misleading or downright wrong.
But, there are occasions where it may be difficult to tell if the writer is being an advocate of a particular position or trying to hide an intention to influence. I have written reviews on these pages in the form of buyer protection. As an example, I reviewed two “glow in the dark phosphorescent paints” and panned them both. It was not that I did not like the manufacturers; it was because I tried the products and they failed to work as advertised. And, I made it clear why they failed and what I had expected. I also faulted the shoddy and misleading advertising of laundry detergent products and how much to use. But, I supported my conclusions with experiments. But, we are all human and can make mistakes. That is why we have the comment section. I have been corrected before and will be again and I appreciate reader’s thoughts and opinions.
So, how can we increase the odds that the information we are reading is accurate, timely, and relevant? Please notice that I said increase the odds and not “be certain”. First, consider the source and the relative weight that the source has. Despite the fact that Wikipedia has become a trusted heavyweight in providing information, I have found many mistakes. Some are trivial but others are significant. But, the contributors to the site often have to provide references or citations backing up their writing. It is somewhat like providing footnotes to a paper before we all trusted the internet. Follow the links and then check other sites for the same subject. (For a link to the reliability of Wikipedia, see the discussion here). Does the site have advertising and if so, does it relate to the content? Read the comments section and watch for “plants” that are designed to support the claims of the post or information.
Second, check the author and look for qualifications. Some are valid, and some are not. This is called the confirmation bias or acceptance of authority argument. Some may actually be Ph D’s and some are just added fluff. Also, see when the article was written to test relevance. Many writers fail to date the information hoping to make it appear relevant.
Third, be reasonable in reading information. While it may be good information, it may also be an opinion wrapped in pretty paper. If it looks too good to be true, it probably is not. As has been said before, trust, then verify…


0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture


    An observer of life and our changing times-Ken

    .

    Categories

    All
    Advertising
    Aspirin
    Car Crashes
    Change
    China
    Corn Ethanol
    Custome Service
    Dancing Bears
    Drunk Drivers
    Dunkin's
    E-Cards
    Evolution
    Experts?
    Failure
    Free
    Good Egg
    Hackers And Crackers
    Internet Radio
    Internet Size
    Layaway
    Listeria
    Manufacturing
    Misleading Medical Reports
    Monopoly 2.0
    Multitasking
    Nature
    Needs
    Noise
    Nurture
    Observation And Inference
    Online Credit Card Fraud
    Online Learning
    Political Circus
    Political Double Speak
    Reality Television
    Search Engines
    Talent
    Term Limits
    Violence
    Wants
    Youtube

    Archives

    June 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    September 2020
    July 2020
    March 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    August 2019
    April 2019
    October 2018
    April 2018
    December 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011

    Categories

    All
    Advertising
    Aspirin
    Car Crashes
    Change
    China
    Corn Ethanol
    Custome Service
    Dancing Bears
    Drunk Drivers
    Dunkin's
    E-Cards
    Evolution
    Experts?
    Failure
    Free
    Good Egg
    Hackers And Crackers
    Internet Radio
    Internet Size
    Layaway
    Listeria
    Manufacturing
    Misleading Medical Reports
    Monopoly 2.0
    Multitasking
    Nature
    Needs
    Noise
    Nurture
    Observation And Inference
    Online Credit Card Fraud
    Online Learning
    Political Circus
    Political Double Speak
    Reality Television
    Search Engines
    Talent
    Term Limits
    Violence
    Wants
    Youtube

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.